<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Improving on 1990&#8242;s Model: The 1991 348 TS Revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.italiansportscar.net/2008/12/improving-on-1990s-model-the-1991-348-ts-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.italiansportscar.net/2008/12/improving-on-1990s-model-the-1991-348-ts-revisited/</link>
	<description>Ferrari, Lamborghini, Maserati</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Dec 2011 02:17:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickel341</title>
		<link>http://www.italiansportscar.net/2008/12/improving-on-1990s-model-the-1991-348-ts-revisited/comment-page-1/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>nickel341</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 23:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ponycars.org/improving-on-1990s-model-the-1991-348-ts-revisited#comment-170</guid>
		<description>Good article.  At first I felt like I needed to refute your review of the Ferrari 348 TS, but after further reflection I can see your point of view.  Perhaps my personal 348 TS Base is an abberation.  What is everyone else&#039;s experiences?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article.  At first I felt like I needed to refute your review of the Ferrari 348 TS, but after further reflection I can see your point of view.  Perhaps my personal 348 TS Base is an abberation.  What is everyone else&#8217;s experiences?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

